世界軍事對付中國 global military against China

[JanetBin]

啟程訪俄拉關係　牽制中國
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/internatio...9/18243546

[JanetBin]

麻生太郎吐真言 日亡華之心不變

http://www.hkdailynews.com.hk/news.php?id=281788

麻生太郎出身於政治世家，曾祖父麻生太吉是大日本帝國時代的貴族院議員，父親麻生賀吉是自民黨的眾議員，外祖父吉田茂是侵華的甲級戰犯，也是自民黨的創始人之一。他的妻子鈴木千賀子是前首相鈴木善幸的女兒，而其妹妹信子則嫁給了三笠宮寬仁親王，也是一個有名的右翼份子。
麻生家族的麻生水泥是有名的大企業，也擁有九州最大的煤礦，而他本人參加過奧運會的射擊項目，本人當過首相，現時則為安倍晉三內閣的副首相兼財務大臣。從以上的履歷，可以見到麻生太郎「此馬來頭大」，可以說是日本政治幾十年的縮影，也可以反映出日本政治的血脈淵源和政商勾結，以及天皇家族在暗中操盤的手影。

拉攏印度 共抗中國
這一次麻生太郎出席在印度的東盟與中日韓及央行行長聯席會議，但中國和韓國的中央銀行行長都沒有出席，麻生太郎的說法是﹕中國和日本的關係從來沒有順暢過。
麻生太郎在日本政界素來有「大嘴巴」之稱，常常亂說話，但是「大嘴巴」也有「大嘴巴」的好處，就是常常脫口說出真心話來，從中國的角度來看，一個「大嘴巴」亂說話的日本政客，總比一個滿口謊言、兩面三刀的日本政客，較為容易對付得多。
事實上，麻生太郎是有名的右翼份子，當年參拜靖國神社，多次美化日本侵華歷史，也否定南京大屠殺，中國和韓國的民眾都對他恨之入骨，央行行長因他的出現，而不到印度出席會議，也是大有道理的事。
大家都知道，中國和印度因邊界糾紛和西藏問題，向來就不和，在1962年還打過一仗。至於中國和日本因日本不肯承認侵華史實，以及釣魚島的主權，更加是百年世仇。如今麻生太郎在印度公然說出反中言論，不無拉攏印度，共抗中國的意味。
現實的政治是，日本和印度兩個大國，因為畏懼中國的崛起，再加上菲律賓和越南等小國，聯合起來，共抗中國的大戰略，已然逐漸形成了包圍的布局，而美國則避免同中國正面面對，而在幕後操盤，這是一個不可避免的大趨勢，也是中國必須面對的問題。
同時，日本的安倍晉三和麻生太郎兩大巨頭，都是著名的反華右翼份子，在他們的治下，日本將會啟動修憲，拋棄以前的和平憲法，以及擴建軍隊，進一步和中國正面對抗，也是可以預見的事。至於其參拜靖國神社、不承認侵華史實，以及在各大傳媒上不斷妖魔化中國，則不過是為了其軍事擴張目的而鋪路，先為國民洗腦和作出意識形態上的改變，才好支持修憲和擴軍而已。
習近平處挑戰年代
中國的發展已經渡過了的鄧小平時代、江澤民時代和胡溫時代，到了今日的習近平時代，無論是在經濟上，還是在政治外交上，都正在面對嚴重的挑戰。中國古語有云﹕「觀一葉而知秋」，這一次在印度，麻生太郎的一句失言，可以窺知日本對於中國的態度，正是「日本亡華之心，百年不變」，而日本和印度在某程度上，連結起來，一起對抗中國的崛起，這將是又一次驗證「多難興邦」的宿命。

[JanetBin]

美國將新加坡拉入“反華軍事同盟”
http://www.chinareviewnews.com/doc/1020/...=102071563

[JanetBin]

日拉攏越南 海疆堵華
http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/china_wor...8_021.html

中日領海主權爭議愈演愈烈，日拉攏越南圖在海疆對華呈包圍之勢。日本媒體披露，日本與越南的首次海洋安全保障會議，日本政府將建議越方將海上警察從人民軍中分離出來，以便日向越出口巡邏船，以強化兩國在南海緊密合作，藉以制衡中國。

籲越將海警抽離軍隊
日本新聞網昨引述消息稱，日越首次海洋安保會議，本月將在越南河內舉行。日本計劃「政府開發援助」（ODA）方式，向越南出口排水量一千噸以上海上巡邏船。

但由於ODA只能援助非軍事組織，日方因此將在會上建議越南把海上警察從人民軍中分離出來，建立海上非軍事組織，以便實現日本海上巡邏船對越出口，強化兩國在南海問題上的緊密合作，以對抗中國日益增加的南海維權行動。而從去年下半年開始，已有越南海軍多名軍人到日本，在海上自衞隊基地參加訓練。

另一方面，上月發表「國際對侵略未定論」言論的日本首相安倍晉三，昨日突然改口，他在參院預算委員會上重申，過去的戰爭「對亞洲多國人民造成巨大的損失和痛苦，這一認識與歷屆內閣相同」。

[JanetBin]

二炮部署「航母殺手」制美
http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/china_wor...8_002.html

[JanetBin]

日元貶值套住中國2800億美元，日本對中國打響貨幣戰爭

http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_5378318c0....html?tj=2

[JanetBin]

美媒：解放军可能会以意想不到方式使用军力
http://news.qq.com/a/20130512/000290.htm

[JanetBin]

空中打擊轉向“大型戰爭”‧美研發“轟炸北京”技術
http://news.sinchew.com.my/node/284818?tid=2

隨著在伊拉克和阿富汗的激烈戰鬥宣告結束，美國正從利用空中力量打擊恐怖分子和非正規軍，轉向“大型戰爭”，美國空軍規劃者將當前的任務目標轉向為研發能夠“轟炸北京”的制勝技術。

環球網星期日摘譯美國“戰略之頁”網站《轟炸北京》（Bombing Beijing）的文章說，這是過去20年美國空中力量應用方式的一個大轉變。

自GPS（全球衛星定位系統）和智慧炸彈以及瞄準吊艙在20世紀90年代引入後，轟炸機飛行員僅僅擔任炸彈運送駕駛員的角色。

瞄準吊艙包含前視紅外成像系統和電視攝像機，能使飛行員在6千300公尺的高度清晰看到地面情況。吊艙上還有為雷射制導導彈服務的雷射指示器，以及能夠使飛行員為聯合直接攻擊彈藥（JDAM）獲取座標的雷射測距儀。

聯合直接攻擊彈藥在1999年科索沃戰爭期間開始服役，且取得巨大成功。使用這種炸彈事實上減少了投擲炸彈的數量和轟炸機出動次數。

建立大型智慧炸彈武器庫

美國空軍目前正努力利用所有這些新技術打擊像中國、朝鮮及伊朗等對手。與此同時，美國建立了一個大型智慧炸彈武器庫。

在入侵伊拉克之後，美國空軍要求大量增加聯合直接攻擊彈藥的產量，目前的戰備物資儲備超過10萬枚，將用於某個未指明的、大型的未來衝突。空戰規劃者們認為，最可能發生的大規模衝突可能會包括中國在內。

[JanetBin]

Bombing Beijing
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htlead/...30322.aspx

With the heavy fighting over in Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. Air Force (along with the navy, marines, and army) are all moving away from using air power against terrorists and irregular troops, towards what they all refer to as “The Big One.” Less discreet air power planners describe their current work directed at developing winning techniques for “Bombing Beijing.”

This is a major change from how American air power has been used for the past two decades. In that time there has been a lot of bombing but not much opposition to the American aircraft. Since GPS smart bombs and targeting pods were introduced in the 1990s, bomber pilots have had their job reduced to that of a bomb-truck driver.

The targeting pods contain FLIR (video quality night vision infrared radar) and TV cameras that enable pilots flying at 6,300meters/20,000 feet to clearly make out what is going on down there. The pods also contain laser designators for laser guided bombs and laser range finders that enable pilots to get coordinates for JDAM (GPS guided) bombs.

Safely outside the range of most anti-aircraft fire, pilots can literally see the progress of ground fighting and have even been acting as aerial observers for ground forces. But these new capabilities also enable pilots to more easily find targets themselves and hit them with highly accurate laser guided or JDAM bombs. While bombers still get target information from ground controllers for close (to friendly troops) air support, they can now go searching on their own, in areas where there are no friendly ground troops. The first such targeting pods were used in the 1991 Gulf War. Those LANTRIN pods had, by current standards, poor camera resolution for the pilots looking at what's down there. But over ten years of technological progress have given the pilots a much sharper vision of what's on the ground.

JDAM smart bombs were developed in the 1990s, shortly after the GPS network went live. These weapons entered service in time for the 1999 Kosovo campaign and have been so successful that their use has actually sharply reduced the number of bombs dropped and the number of sorties required by bombers. The air force generals are still trying to figure out where this is all going. Now the big effort is directed towards using all this new tech to shut down a more feisty opponent like China (or Iran or North Korea, two more feisty but less well equipped foes).

Meanwhile, the U.S. has built up a huge arsenal of smart bombs. After the invasion of Iraq, the U.S. Air Force ordered a sharp increase in JDAM production, aiming for 5,000 JDAM a month. They ended up needing far less. In 2005, about 30,000 JDAM were ordered. That fell to 11,605 in 2006, and 10,661 in 2007. In 2008, only 5,000 were ordered. Most of those ordered in the past few years are being put into the war reserve. Only a few thousand a year are actually being used, and this includes those expended during training. The war reserve contains over 100,000 kits, to be used in some unspecified, but big, future conflict. Air warfare planners see the most likely major conflict as one involving China.

The appearance, and impact, of JDAM has been sudden. While guided bombs first appeared towards the end of World War II, they did not really become a factor until highly accurate laser guided bombs were developed in the 1960s. A decade later TV guided bombs came into service. But these guided bombs were expensive, costing over $100,000 each. Even as late as the 1991 Gulf war, only 16 percent of the 250,000 bombs dropped were guided. But analysis of the battlefield later revealed that the guided bombs had done 75 percent of the actual damage. The guided bombs were still too expensive and lasers were blocked by many weather conditions (rain, mist, sand storms). Something new was needed to replace dumb bombs completely. The solution was GPS guided bombs.

In 1991, the GPS system was just coming into service. There were already plans for something like JDAM but no one was sure that it would work. Once the engineers got onto it, it was discovered that JDAM not only worked but cost less than half as much to build ($18,000 per bomb) as the air force expected ($40,000 a bomb, or about $55,000 adjusted for inflation).

So in 1996, production of JDAM began. During their first use, in Kosovo, 98 percent of the 652 JDAMs used hit their targets. In 2001, JDAM proved the ideal weapon for supporting the few hundred Special Forces and CIA personnel the U.S. had on the ground in Afghanistan. The JDAM was more accurate, and effective, than anticipated. By January, 2002, the U.S. had dropped about half their inventory, of 10,000 JDAMs, in Afghanistan.

In 2003, 6,500 JDAM were used in the three week 2003 Iraq invasion. Since 1999, American aircraft have used less than 30,000. New versions have added more capabilities. The latest versions are even more accurate, putting half the bombs within ten meters of the aiming point. JDAMs are pretty rugged. F-22s have dropped half ton JDAMs, from 50,000 feet (16,100 meters), while moving at over 1,500 kilometers an hour.

But now planners have to develop techniques for overcoming modern anti-aircraft systems and GPS jammers. The U.S. Air Force and Navy have long been working on such problems, but those efforts took a back seat (and got less money) during the last decade, in order to concentrate on the wars at hand. The smart bomb techniques developed, including the use of UAVs to find targets, and to attack some of them with guided missiles, were very successful. But against a better prepared and equipped foe success is less certain.

Throughout the Cold War (1947-91) the U.S. worked hard to develop methods for dealing with tough air defenses. This work got tested in Vietnam and the 1973 Arab-Israeli war. These conflicts showed that with the right equipment and tactics the attacker could succeed, and without debilitating losses. But this kind of air warfare is full of dangers, surprises, and much higher potential for defeat.

[JanetBin]

台軍今護漁南海軍演
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/internatio...6/18261617