Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
台灣防衛法 Taiwan Defense Act, 台灣關係法 Taiwan Relations Act
#11
據報美軍秘密駐台灣訓練軍隊至少一年 北京批損害中美關係
https://news.tvb.com/world/615fccde34b03...C%E4%BF%82

美國傳媒報道,美軍特種部隊和陸戰隊秘密在台灣訓練軍隊至少一年,應對大陸軍事威脅。美國國防部不評論報道,但強調美國對台灣的支持,跟目前大陸構成的威脅一致。在北京,外交部多次批評美方加強與台灣軍事聯繫,損害中美關係,破壞地區和平穩定。

美國《華爾街日報》引述匿名美國官員報道,美軍特種作戰及支援部隊約20多名成員在台灣訓練當地陸軍小型分隊,美軍陸戰隊則與台灣的海軍從事小艇訓練。

報道引述該官員稱,美軍採取輪調模式,在台灣運作了至少一年,意味美軍成員是在不同時間到台灣提供訓練。

報道形容,大陸近期加強對台灣軍事威嚇,美軍到台灣提供訓練的做法,反映美國國防部內部關注台灣戰術能力。

路透社其後亦引述兩名知情人士報道,指有小量美軍特種部隊一直以臨時輪調形式到台灣,為台灣軍隊提供訓練;又暗示有關行動早於美國總統拜登年初上任前已進行。

在台灣,國防部不評論有關報道,只稱各項軍事交流均依年度計劃進行。國防部副部長柏鴻輝形容台海情況嚴峻,強調在國際上若有任何合作,都會表示歡迎。

美國國防部發言人蘇普萊亦稱,不評論有關報道,但稱大陸擴大對台灣與其他盟友及夥伴的脅迫與施壓,包括增加在台灣、東海與南海附近的軍事行動,破壞穩定並增加誤判風險,強調美國對台灣的支持,以及美台防務關係,跟台灣目前面對大陸的威脅一致。

美國維持堅實對台支持,符合「一中」政策的長期承諾;又重申美國將繼續支持在符合兩岸人民意願與最佳利益的情況下,和平解決兩岸議題。

在北京,外交部多次重申,台灣是中國的台灣,美方在對台售武、加強美台軍事聯繫等方面,消極動作不斷,損害中美關係,破壞地區和平穩定,中方堅決反對,並採取必要應對措施。

據報美軍在台訓練軍隊逾一年 北京促美方停止美台軍事聯繫
https://news.tvb.com/world/61600b64335d1...F%E7%B9%AB

美國傳媒報道,美軍特種部隊和陸戰隊秘密在台灣訓練軍隊至少一年,應對大陸軍事威脅,美國國防部及台灣軍方均不評論報道。在北京,外交部促請美方停止美台軍事聯繫,以免嚴重損害中美關係和台海和平穩定。

美國《華爾街日報》引述匿名美國官員報道,美軍特種作戰及支援部隊約20多名成員,在台灣訓練當地陸軍小型分隊,美軍陸戰隊則與台灣的海軍從事小艇訓練。

報道引述該官員稱,美軍採取輪調模式在台灣運作了至少一年,意味美軍成員是在不同時間到台灣提供訓練。報道形容,大陸近期加強對台灣軍事威嚇,美軍到台灣提供訓練的做法,反映美國國防部內部關注台灣戰術能力。

路透社其後亦引述兩名知情人士報道,指有小量美軍特種部隊一直以臨時輪調形式到台灣,為台灣軍隊提供訓練;又暗示有關行動早於美國總統拜登年初上任前已進行。

在台灣,國防部不評論有關報道,只稱各項軍事交流均依年度計劃進行。美國國防部發言人蘇普萊亦稱不評論有關報道,但強調美國對台灣的支持以及美台防務關係,跟台灣目前面對大陸的威脅一致,美國維持堅實對台支持符合「一個中國」政策的長期承諾;又重申美國將繼續支持在符合兩岸人民意願與最佳利益的情況下,和平解決兩岸議題。

在北京,外交部促請美方停止美台軍事聯繫,強調「一中」政策是中美關係的政治支柱。

外交部發言人趙立堅表示︰「美國應充分認清涉台問題的高度敏感性和有關問題的嚴重危害性,恪守『一個中國』原則和中美三個聯合公報規定,停止售台武裝和美台軍事聯繫,以免嚴重損害中美關係和台海和平穩定。」

他又稱,中方會採取一切必要措施,捍衛主權領土完整。
Reply
#12
拜登:倘中國攻台 美國將協防 白宮其後稱對台政策沒變
https://www.hk01.com/%E5%8D%B3%E6%99%82%...m=referral

美國總統拜登(Joe Biden)10月21日稱美國將協防台灣,並稱美國有協防台灣的承諾。白宮其後表示,美對台政策沒變。

他在被記者問道「如果中國攻擊,美國是否將保衛台灣」的問題時表示,如果中國方面可能對台灣進行「軍事侵略」,美國準備「保衛台灣」。

拜登在美國有線新聞網絡(CNN)與選民交流時表示:「是的,我們這樣的承諾。」不過白宮其後稱,他的言論並不是宣布美國政策有什麼轉變,「我們的政策沒有改變。」

民主黨和共和黨議員當中,都有聲音要求拜登政府採取對台「戰略清晰」,放棄過去40多年的「戰略模糊」(strategic ambiguity)政策。

美台防禦關係依《台灣關係法》及六項保證規範,美國在法理和「義務」上須協助台灣自衛,惟華府一直採取「戰略模糊」政策,從未清楚表明會否在中國大陸攻擊台灣時保衛台灣。

此外拜登稱,美國擁有全球最強大的武裝力量,呼籲國民不要擔憂任何其他大國會超過美國,其中包括俄羅斯和中國。

拜登說,「中國、俄羅斯和整個剩餘世界都明白美國有世界史上最強大的武裝力量,不要擔心他們(其他國家)會超過我們。人們需擔心的是,他們會否從事什麼活動,令他們處於犯下嚴重錯誤的處境。」

拜登:如果中國大陸動武 美國會保衛台灣
https://hk.finance.yahoo.com/news/%E6%8B...31189.html

面對要美國政府澄清對台立場的呼聲,該國總統喬·拜登發表了頗為強烈的一些言論。他說,美國致力於在大陸動武的情況下保衛台灣。

拜登周四在參加CNN活動時被問到他是否能承諾保護台灣,並給出了肯定的答案。「我不想與中國冷戰——我只是想讓中國明白,我們不會退後,我們不會改變任何觀點,」拜登在巴爾的摩告訴主持人Anderson Cooper。

當被問及如果中國大陸試圖攻打台灣,他是否會保衛台灣時,他回應說:「是的,我們有這樣做的承諾。」

一位白宮發言人隨後表示,拜登並未宣布改變美國對台政策。該發言人表示,美國將繼續依據《與台灣關係法》履行承諾,支持台灣的自衛,反對單方面改變現狀。

「沒人想看到海峽兩岸問題引發衝突,拜登總統當然不想看到這樣,而且沒理由變成這樣,」美國國防部長奧斯丁周五在布魯塞爾舉行的北約國防部長會議結束後對記者們表示。

中國外交部發言人汪文斌周五在例行新聞發布會上並未就此嚴詞責備,只是敦促美方在台灣問題上「謹言慎行」,恪守「一個中國」原則和中美三個聯合公報的規定。在拜登和中國國家主席習近平準備舉行首個視頻峰會之際,北京方面減少了對華盛頓的公開批評。據路透社周四引述知情人士的消息報導,美國準備於下個月晚些時候舉行兩人的會晤。

在習近平加大對台灣政府的外交和軍事施壓之際,要拜登政府澄清美國保衛台灣承諾的呼聲日益高漲。中國主張台灣是中國領土,並保留武力統一的權利。

雖然美國在四十多年前承認中華人民共和國政府是「中國的唯一合法政府」,但它從未明確表示在台灣主權問題上的立場,也未明確表示過是否會使用武力保衛台灣——一項有時被描述為「戰略性模棱兩可」的政策。美國與台灣維持了非正式關係,並依據《與台灣關係法》向台灣出售武器。拜登當年作為參議員向該法案投了支持票。

美國在1979年用《與台灣關係法》取代了其與台灣的《共同防禦條約》,與後者不同的是,前者並未規定美國在台灣遇襲時有出手干預的義務。中國已一再警告稱,恢復這樣一種安防關係違反曾為中美建交掃清道路的「一個中國」原則。

面對一些人要求加強對台灣的支持,一些人則擔心與有核武器的對手發生軍事衝突求,拜登政府難以在兩者之間找到平衡。在拜登8月份把美國對台灣的安全承諾跟其與日本和南韓等國的正式聯盟劃上等號之後,美國政府已澄清稱其立場未變。

本月早些時候,拜登說他和習近平已承諾「遵守台灣約定」,但是並不存在這樣一個約定。他似乎指的是一系列美中公報,這些公報為兩國過去四十年的外交關係奠定了基礎。

本月早些時候,拜登說他和習近平已承諾「遵守台灣協議」,儘管並不存在這個名字的協議。他似乎指的是為兩國40年前建交奠定了基礎的一系列中美聯合公報。

在2001年,時任美國總統小布什曾作出類似的保護台灣承諾,稱他將下令不計代價幫助台灣自衛。當時是參議員的拜登在《華盛頓郵報》上撰文批評這些言論,說這是「模棱兩可的戰略模棱兩可」。

原文標題Biden Says U.S. Would Defend Taiwan From Attack by China (4)

[ 本帖最後由 失踪的老公 於 2021-10-22 14:31 編輯 ]
Reply
#13
美國稱續按《台灣關係法》等支持台方防衛 北京促美恪守「一中」原則
https://news.tvb.com/greaterchina/618636...F%E5%89%87

美國國務院強調,在台灣問題上,美方的政策並無改變,會繼續根據《台灣關係法》等,支持台灣的自我防衛。

美國國務院發言人普賴斯表示︰「我們將堅持我們的『一個中國』政策,即是根據六項保證、三個聯合公報及《台灣關係法》。」

有記者問:「你說『我們的一中政策』,這是否意味與中國的『一中』原則不同?」

普賴斯回應︰「我們有的『一中』政策與中國的版本不同。」

在北京,外交部多次表明台灣是中國不可分割的一部分,台灣問題純屬中國內政,不容任何外來干涉,敦促美方恪守「一中」原則和中美三個聯合公報的規定,在台灣問題上謹言慎行,以免損害中美關係和台海和平穩定。
Reply
#14
美國共和黨參議員提出《台灣威懾法》 加強台灣防禦能力
https://www.hk01.com/%E5%8D%B3%E6%99%82%...D%E5%8A%9B

美國共和黨籍參議員11月4日提出一項法案,尋求向台灣每年提供資金與其他援助,總值20億美元,以此提升台灣的防禦能力。

名為《台灣威懾法》(Taiwan Deterrence Act)的法字,將授權美國每年從讓美國以外的地區購買美國生產的武器和國防設備的融資項目中,向台灣提供這筆資金,直到2032年。

這筆錢也附帶條件,包括台灣承諾他們的支出與美國的匹配。

法案將修改管理對外軍售的《武器出口控制法》,使美國公司更容易向台灣出售武器,並要求就台灣推進針對中國大陸的防禦戰略事宜,進行年度評估。

法案也將改善美台軍事交流,並擴大台灣軍事人員在美國的專業軍事教育和技術培訓機會。

美國海軍部長:北京接收台灣「威脅美經濟安全」
美國最高將領米利:美軍絕對有能力保衛台灣
美國防部:北京目標2027年有能力迫使台灣談判
美軍最高將領:中國大陸短期內不太可能武力攻佔台灣
Reply
#15
「台灣是獨立的,自己做決定」:拜登在與習近平會晤後如是說
https://hk.finance.yahoo.com/news/%E6%8B...47265.html

美國總統拜登在與中國國家主席習近平會晤後再次表態支持台灣當局,稱該島「自己的決定自己做」。

「我們非常明確地表示我們支持《台灣法》,僅此而已,」 拜登周二在赴新罕布什爾州途中對記者說。他指美國1979年通過的《台灣關係法》。

它是獨立的。它自己做決定,」 他還說。

一個峰會、各自表述:習拜會中美聲明對比

白宮發布的紀要顯示,拜登在峰會上對習近平強調,美國仍然致力於《台灣關係法》、三個聯合公報和六項保證指導下的 「一個中國」政策。「兩位領導人在台灣問題上談了很長時間,」 他的國家安全顧問沙利文周二在布魯金斯學會的一次活動上說,「總統提醒習近平,他當參議員的時候曾投票支持《台灣關係法》。」

「兩位領導人在台灣問題上花費了大量時間,」 沙利文說。

《台灣關係法》是規範美台關係的指引性文件,確立了美國將通過出售武器和遏制大陸武力攻台的企圖,來支持台灣自我防衛。

沙利文是參加該次長達三個半小時視頻峰會的少數官員之一。美國官員表示,討論是坦誠和尊重的。

「這是一次不錯的會晤,」 拜登說,「我們做了很多跟進,我們成立了四個小組,我們將在一系列問題上把大家召集起來。我會在未來兩周向你們報告更多消息。」

拜登和習近平還討論了兩國如何「共同努力確保全球能源供應和價格波動不會危及全球經濟復甦,」 沙利文說,「兩位元首要求他們的團隊在這個問題上迅速開展協調。」

拜登上月對CNN表示,如果大陸單方面改變台海現狀,美國將防衛台灣,而白宮後來發布的澄清聲明只是重申了美國的長期政策。

中方發布的聲明稱,拜登不支持台獨。習近平警告說,美方一些人有意搞「以台制華」。這一趨勢十分危險,是在玩火,而玩火者必自焚。

台灣外交部指責北京「故意」歪曲拜登的言論。

原文標題Biden Says After Xi Summit That Taiwan ‘Makes Its Own Decisions’


Biden Says After Xi Summit That Taiwan ‘Makes Its Own Decisions’
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ing-summit

President Joe Biden said that Taiwan “makes its own decisions,” backing the island’s leaders anew after a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping intended to stabilize the tense relationship between the world’s two largest economies.

“We made very clear we support the Taiwan Act, and that’s it,” Biden told reporters Tuesday during a trip to New Hampshire, referring to the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act.

It’s independent. It makes its own decisions,” he added.

Even so, Biden said during the summit that the U.S. remains committed to its “One China” policy, according to a White House statement. Biden reminded Xi during the meeting that he voted as a senator to support Taiwan’s self-defense when the two discussed the island, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said Tuesday.

“The two leaders spent a good amount of time on the question of Taiwan,” Sullivan said at a Brookings Institution event on Tuesday.

The act established that the U.S. will support Taiwan’s self-defense with weapons sales and discourage any attempt by China to retake the island by force.

Sullivan was one of the few officials who participated in the summit, which lasted 3 1/2 hours. U.S. officials said the discussion was candid and respectful.

“It was a good meeting,” Biden said. “We’ve got a lot of follow-up on, we set up four groups, we’re going to get our folks together on a whole range of issues. I’ll have more to report to you in the next two weeks.”

As anticipated, the conversation between Biden and Xi was mostly aimed at setting the rules of engagement between the world’s two largest economies, in an effort to avoid unintended military conflict or economic damage. China and the U.S. have been at odds over Taiwan, the South China Sea, trade and human rights, among other issues.

The leaders also discussed how their countries “can work together to ensure global energy supply and price volatility do not imperil the global economic recovery,” Sullivan said. “The two presidents tasked their teams to coordinate on this issue expeditiously.”
Reply
#16
倘若中國武統台灣?耶倫說美國將動用全部制裁工具
https://hk.finance.yahoo.com/news/%E5%80...20033.html

【彭博】-- 美國財政部長耶倫表示,如果北京對台灣動武,拜登政府會準備好使用所有制裁工具懲罰中國。

「我相信我們已經顯示,我們能夠」對侵略性的國家造成巨大痛苦,對俄羅斯的制裁已經證明了這一點,耶倫周三在眾議院金融服務委員會作證詞時對議員們說,「我認為你們不應該懷疑我們面臨其他情況時做同樣事情的能力和決心。」

耶倫在回答來自北卡羅來納州的共和黨眾議員Patrick McHenry提問時做了上述表示。後者問她財政部是否會像俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭後對待莫斯科那樣願意對中國實施制裁。

原文標題
Yellen Says U.S. Would Use Sanctions If China Invaded Taiwan

Yellen Says U.S. Would Use Sanctions If China Invaded Taiwan
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ded-taiwan
Treasury secretary comments during congressional hearing
‘You should not doubt’ U.S. resolve to use its tools

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the Biden administration would be prepared to use all its sanctions tools against China if Beijing moved aggressively toward Taiwan.

“I believe we’ve shown we can” impose significant pain on aggressive countries, as evidenced by sanctions against Russia, Yellen told lawmakers Wednesday as she testified before the House Financial Services Committee. “I think you should not doubt our ability and resolve to do the same in other situations.”

Yellen was responding to questions from Republican Representative Patrick McHenry of North Carolina over whether the Treasury would be as willing to use sanctions against China as it has against Russia following Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine.

Read more: Yellen to Warn War Threatens ‘Enormous Economic Repercussions’

Russia’s attack on Ukraine has undermined confidence that world powers would be able to prevent a crisis from similarly erupting over Taiwan, a democratically governed island of more than 23 million people and key global source of semiconductors. China has long claimed Taiwan as a renegade province and threatened to invade to prevent its independence.

Last month, China warned the U.S. against trying to build what it called a Pacific version of NATO, while declaring that security disputes over Taiwan and Ukraine were “not comparable at all.”

US Treasury Secretary Yellen: US open to all tools if China invaded Taiwan
https://www.fxstreet.com/news/us-treasur...2204061440

The United States is open to all tools if China invades Taiwan, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Wednesday, reported Bloomberg. The US is monitoring attempts to use crypto to evade sanctions, she added, referring to sanctions on Russia.

A senior Biden administration official just announced that the US is "dramatically escalating" the financial shock on Russia by cutting off the country's largest banks. The US is to impose full blocking sanctions on Russia's Sberbank and Alfa Bank, the official added, while US President Joe Biden is also set to sign a new executive order banning all new investment in Russia.

Ukraine war: US spells out sanctions on Russia, heaping more pressure on China to comply
https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-econo...aping-more

Among the various restrictions, if a Russia-bound item was made using American tools or equipment, it could be covered by Washington’s sanctions

But while Chinese firms may try to avoid running afoul of US sanctions, overall China-Russia trade should remain strong because most products will not be affected

Here’s What Could Happen If China Invaded Taiwan (Repeat)
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/could-hap...33836.html

[Image: 8c3a9db37455259b872c89bc9190ba4b]

(Bloomberg) — (This story was originally published in Oct. 2020. It’s being republished to accompany our Big Take on the risks of attacking Taiwan.)

Xi Jinping’s Chinese Communist Party has threatened to invade Taiwan for more than seven decades. Now fears are growing among analysts, officials and investors that it might actually follow through over the next few years, potentially triggering a war with the U.S.

In September, People’s Liberation Army aircraft repeatedly breached the median line in the Taiwan Strait, eliminating a de facto buffer zone that has kept peace for decades. The party-run Global Times newspaper has given a picture of what could come, urging China’s air force to patrol the skies over Taiwan and “achieve reunification through military means” if it fires any shots. Taiwan announced it would only shoot if attacked.

Despite the saber rattling, China and Taiwan have many reasons to avoid a war that could kill tens of thousands, devastate their economies and potentially lead to a nuclear conflict with the U.S. and its allies. The overwhelming consensus remains that Beijing will continue efforts to control Taiwan through military threats, diplomatic isolation and economic incentives. Equities in Taiwan have recently hit record highs.

But several forces may push them toward action: President Xi Jinping’s desire to cement his legacy by gaining “lost” territory, falling support among Taiwan’s public for any union with China, the rise of pro-independence forces in Taipei and the U.S.’s increasingly hostile relationship with Beijing on everything from Hong Kong to the coronavirus to cutting-edge technology.

“I am increasingly concerned that a major crisis is coming,” said Ian Easton, senior director at the Project 2049 Institute who wrote “The Chinese Invasion Threat: Taiwan’s Defense and American Strategy in Asia.” “It is possible to envision this ending in an all-out invasion attempt and superpower war. The next five to 10 years are going to be dangerous ones. This flash point is fundamentally unstable.”

Taiwan will be among the most pressing security issues facing whoever wins the U.S. election on Nov. 3. While Taipei has enjoyed a resurgence of bipartisan support in Washington and the Trump administration has made unprecedented overtures, President Donald Trump himself has expressed skepticism about Taiwan’s strategic value. Democratic nominee Joe Biden has previously said Congress should decide whether the U.S. should defend Taiwan in any attack.

Analysts such as Easton have gamed out scenarios of a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan for years, based on military exercises, arms purchases and strategy documents from the major players. Most of them foresee China going for a quick knockout, in which the PLA overwhelms the main island before the U.S. could help out.

On paper, the military balance heavily favors Beijing. China spends about 25 times more on its military than Taiwan, according to estimates from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, and has a clear conventional edge on everything from missiles and fighter jets to warships and troop levels — not to mention its nuclear arsenal.

Beijing’s optimistic version of events goes something like this: Prior to an invasion, cyber and electronic warfare units would target Taiwan’s financial system and key infrastructure, as well as U.S. satellites to reduce notice of impending ballistic missiles. Chinese vessels could also harass ships around Taiwan, restricting vital supplies of fuel and food.

Airstrikes would quickly aim to kill Taiwan’s top political and military leaders, while also immobilizing local defenses. The Chinese military has described some drills as “decapitation” exercises, and satellite imagery shows its training grounds include full-scale replicas of targets such as the Presidential Office Building.

An invasion would follow, with PLA warships and submarines traversing some 130 kilometers (80 miles) across the Taiwan Strait. Outlying islands such as Kinmen and Pratas could be quickly subsumed before a fight for the Penghu archipelago, which sits just 50 kilometers from Taiwan and is home to bases for all three branches of its military. A PLA win here would provide it with a valuable staging point for a broader attack.

As Chinese ships speed across the strait, thousands of paratroopers would appear above Taiwan’s coastlines, looking to penetrate defenses, capture strategic buildings and establish beachheads through which the PLA could bring in tens of thousands of soldiers who would secure a decisive victory.

In reality, any invasion is likely to be much riskier. Taiwan has prepared for one for decades, even if lately it has struggled to match China’s growing military advantage.

Taiwan’s main island has natural defenses: Surrounded by rough seas with unpredictable weather, its rugged coastline offers few places with a wide beach suitable for a large ship that could bring in enough troops to subdue its 24 million people. The mountainous terrain is riddled with tunnels designed to keep key leaders alive, and could provide cover for insurgents if China established control.

Taiwan in 2018 unveiled a plan to boost asymmetric capabilities like mobile missile systems that could avoid detection, making it unlikely Beijing could quickly destroy all of its defensive weaponry. With thousands of surface-to-air missiles and anti-aircraft guns, Taiwan could inflict heavy losses on the Chinese invasion force before it reached the main island.

Taiwan’s military has fortified defenses around key landing points and regularly conducts drills to repel Chinese forces arriving by sea and from the air. In July outside of the western port of Taichung, Apache helicopters, F-16s and Taiwan’s own domestically developed fighter jets sent plumes of seawater into the sky as they fired offshore while M60 tanks, artillery guns and missile batteries pummeled targets on the beach.

Chinese troops who make it ashore would face roughly 175,000 full-time soldiers and more than 1 million reservists ready to resist an occupation. Taiwan this week announced it would set up a defense mobilization agency to ensure they were better prepared for combat, the Taipei Times reported. Other options for Beijing, such as an indiscriminate bombing campaign that kills hundreds of thousands of civilians, would hurt the Communist Party’s ultimate goal of showcasing Taiwan as a prosperous territory with loyal Chinese citizens, Michael Beckley, who’s advised the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence communities, wrote in a 2017 paper.

“The PLA clearly would have its hands full just dealing with Taiwan’s defenders,” Beckley wrote. “Consequently, the United States would only need to tip the scales of the battle to foil a Chinese invasion.”

The potential involvement of the U.S. is a key wild card when assessing an invasion scenario. American naval power has long deterred China from any attack, even though the U.S. scrapped its mutual defense treaty with Taiwan in 1979 as a condition for establishing diplomatic ties with Beijing. The Taiwan Relations Act authorizes American weapons sales to “maintain a sufficient self-defense capability.”

Failing to intervene could hurt U.S. prestige on scale similar to the U.K.’s failed bid to regain control of the Suez Canal in 1956, Ray Dalio, the billionaire founder of Bridgewater Associates, wrote on Sept. 25. That crisis accelerated the disintegration of the British Empire and signaled the pound’s decline as a reserve currency in favor of the dollar, Dalio said.

“The more of a show the U.S. makes of defending Taiwan the greater the humiliation of a lost war,” he said. “That is concerning because the United States has been making quite a show of defending Taiwan while destiny appears to be bringing that closer to a reality.”

China’s Anti-Secession Law is vague on what would actually trigger an armed conflict. Its state-run media have warned that any U.S. military deployment to Taiwan would trigger a war — one of several apparent red lines, along with a move for Taipei’s government to declare legal independence. State broadcaster CCTV recently warned “the first battle would be the last battle.”

Since the Communist Party’s legitimacy is based in part on a pledge to “unify” China, its hold on the country’s 1.4 billion people could weaken if it allowed Taiwan to become an independent country. And while any invasion even of outlying islands carries the risks of economic sanctions or a destabilizing conflict, threats issued in state-run media allow Beijing to appeal to a domestic audience and deter Taiwan at the same time.

The PLA Air Force released a video in September showing H-6 bombers making a simulated strike on a runway that looked like one at Anderson Air Force Base on Guam, a key staging area for any U.S. support for Taiwan. The Global Times reported that China’s intermediate ballistic missiles such as the DF-26 could take out American bases while its air defenses shoot down incoming firepower.

This is a worry for U.S. military planners. A University of Sydney study warned last year that America “no longer enjoys military primacy” over China and that U.S. bases, airstrips and ports in the region “could be rendered useless by precision strikes in the opening hours of a conflict.”

“Beijing’s strategy isn’t just based on undermining Taiwan’s resistance, it’s also a gamble on how the U.S. will approach the cross-strait issue,” Daniel Russel, a former top State Department official under President Barack Obama, said in Taipei on Sept. 8. “The strongest driver of increased Chinese assertiveness is the conviction that the Western system, and the U.S. in particular, is in decay.”

In August, China fired four missiles into the South China Sea capable of destroying U.S. bases and aircraft carriers. Since the DF-26 can be armed with both nuclear and conventional warheads, arms-control experts have worried that any signs China was mobilizing to fire one could trigger a preemptive U.S. strike against Chinese nuclear forces — potentially leading to an uncontrollable conflict.

Whether the world will ever get to that moment largely hinges on political leaders in Beijing and Washington.

Some in the U.S., like Trump’s former national security adviser, John Bolton, wanted the administration to do much more to show it would come to Taiwan’s aid. Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, argued last month that the U.S. should explicitly state it would intervene to deter Xi and reassure allies.

“Above all, Xi is motivated by a desire to maintain the CCP’s dominance of China’s political system,” Haass wrote in Foreign Affairs magazine on Sept. 2 in a piece co-authored with David Sacks. “A failed bid to ‘reunify’ Taiwan with China would put that dominance in peril, and that is a risk Xi is unlikely to take.”

China’s military said in September that it would defeat Taiwan independence “at all cost.” Ma Xiaoguang, a spokesman for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office in Beijing, separately warned that Tsai’s pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party was “totally misjudging” the situation.

Taiwanese officials have also said China’s military threat is rising, even though Defense Minister Yen De-fa told lawmakers on Sept. 29 there’s no sign the PLA is amassing troops for an invasion.

“We simply have to be prepared for the worst,” said Enoch Wu, a former non-commissioned officer in Taiwan’s special forces now with Tsai's ruling party who heads the Taipei-based Forward Alliance, a group that promotes security reforms. “China is no longer ‘biding its time’ and no longer trying to win hearts and minds.”

Ultimately, Xi would need to order any attack. Last year he said “peaceful reunification” would be best even though he wouldn’t “renounce the use of force.” He called Taiwan’s integration with China “a must for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation in the new era” — a key reason he’s used to justify scrapping presidential term limits in becoming China’s most powerful leader since Mao Zedong.

While an invasion carries enormous risks for the party, Xi has shown he will take strong action on territorial disputes. He’s ignored international condemnation in squashing Hong Kong’s pro-democracy camp, militarizing contested South China Sea land features and setting up reeducation camps for more than a million Muslim Uighurs in Xinjiang.

That record worries analysts like Easton, who wrote the book on China’s invasion threat.

“Taiwan fighting by itself could make Beijing pay a terrible price, at least several hundreds of thousands in casualties,” he said. “But that may be a price Xi Jinping is willing to pay. We underestimate the CCP’s capacity for radical decision making at our peril.”
Reply
#17
美副國務卿籲陸吸取俄教訓 若武力犯台國際社會必回應
https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/intnews/2022...2_001.html

美國副國務卿舍曼周三(6日)表示,中國大陸應由俄烏戰事吸取教訓,若武力侵犯台灣,國際社會必會回應
舍曼出席眾議院外交委員會聽證會,被問到若大陸武力犯台,國際社會較難如俄烏戰事般,集結力量聲援台灣,美方如何回應。

舍曼回應時指出,強調美國的一中政策,不接受大陸企圖以武力奪台,此舉無助於台海或印太區域穩定。她指美國會持續協助台灣維持足夠自衞能力,提供必要武器。美國也會保持能力,抵抗任何會危及台灣的武力或脅迫行動。

舍曼又指出,美國與盟友對俄羅斯實施多項制裁,讓大陸清楚了解,若向俄國提供任何物資支援,將會面臨後果

美財長耶倫:若中國攻台 將面臨與俄同等制裁
https://www.hk01.com/%E5%8D%B3%E6%99%82%...6%E8%A3%81

自俄烏開戰以來,將台灣與烏克蘭作比較的聲音就一直存在,而美國在相關問題上對台灣的表態也就更令外界關注。

據美國彭博社4月6日報道,美財長耶倫(Janet Yellen)6日表示,如果北京對台灣採取激進行動,拜登(Joe Biden)政府將準備對中國使用所有制裁工具

據報道,耶倫6日在眾議院金融服務委員會(House Financial Services Committee)作報告時,北卡羅來納州共和黨眾議員麥克亨利(Patrick McHenry)向其提問稱,假如中國對台灣採取行動,財政部是否會像在俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭後對俄一樣對中國實施制裁?

耶倫回答說:「絕對會。我認為我們已經證明了我們可以。在俄羅斯的問題上,我們威脅要有嚴重後果。我們已經施加了嚴重後果。我認為,你們不應該懷疑我們在其他情況下採取同樣行動的能力和決心。」

彭博社指出,俄羅斯對烏克蘭的攻擊削弱了人們對世界大國能夠防止台灣同樣爆發危機的信心

大陸孤立台灣 美智庫促華府外交抵制
https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/cnnews/20220...2_001.html

美國智庫德國馬歇爾基金會周四(24日)發表報告,敦促美國應組織夥伴國家展開一場外交運動,抵制中國大陸把台灣排除在聯合國機構和其他國際組織外的愈來愈強迫性做法

報告建議美國官員要主動出擊抵制大陸在聯合國高層的普遍影響力,反對陸方官員在聯合國機構擔任高級職位的任命和選舉。基金會指,大陸外交官努力確保台灣不能參加國際機構活動,會迫使聯合國人員保證在文件把台灣寫成「中國的一個省」。

聯合國於1971年通過了承認中華人民共和國是中國在聯合國唯一合法代表決議,報告指北京利用決議及與其他成員國建立正常雙邊關係的協議,錯誤地聲稱「一個中國」原則是受普遍接受的準則,部分做法是通過對政府施加經濟壓力。北京亦會就對台灣的表述向私營企業和非政府組織施壓,例如陸方在新冠疫情爆發初期禁止台灣參加世衞大會。大陸駐美國大使館發言人劉鵬宇說,台灣地區參與國際組織、包括世界衞生組織的活動,必須遵守「一個中國」原則。
Reply
#18
拜登:一旦大陸攻台 美願軍事介入護台
https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/cnnews/20220...2_001.html

美國總統拜登周一(23日)在日本會見日揆岸田文雄後見記者,他表明一旦中國大陸攻台,美國會軍事介入捍衞台灣。拜登言論一出,外界即指美國改變一貫的對台戰略模糊態度,惟白宮官員隨即強調美國對台政策不變。中國大陸外交部隨即回應,敦促美國在台灣問題上謹言慎行。

記者問及拜登不願軍事介入俄烏戰事,但若大陸攻台,美國又是否願意軍事介入,他回答:「是的。」他指出美國曾對台灣作出承諾,華府同意「一中政策」及所有附加協議,但北京武統台灣是不合適,會動搖整個地區,後果比俄羅斯攻打烏克蘭更嚴重。拜登又指,北京的軍機飛近台灣及其他所有行徑都是危險的事。

大陸外交部汪文斌強調,台灣是中國不可分割的一部分,陸方將採取強而有力的行動維護自身主權和安全利益。陸方呼籲美方恪守一個中國原則和中美三個聯合公報的規定,恪守不支持「台獨」的承諾,不向「台獨」分裂勢力發出錯誤信號。台灣的外交部則指,大陸對台海安全構成的挑戰已引起國際社會高度關切,台方會持續提升自我防衞能力,並與美國及日本等理念相近國家深化合作,共同捍衞台海安全。

拜登:大陸一旦攻台 美願軍事介入捍衛
https://www.am730.com.hk/%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A...%9B/320609

美國總統拜登訪日,推動「印太經濟框架」,並與日本首相岸田文雄首次面對面會面,其後兩方舉行美日峰會及會見記者。美國總統拜登表示,一旦中國大陸攻擊台灣,美國會軍事介入捍衛台灣,惟美國白宮官員隨即重申華府對台政策不變。

指北京攻台後果比俄羅斯更嚴重
記者問及拜登不願意軍事介入俄烏戰事,但若中國大陸攻台,美國是否願意軍事保衛台灣,拜登回應:「是的」,又說是美方曾對台灣作出的承諾,重申華府同意「一中政策」及所有附加協議,但北京武統台灣會動搖整個地區,後果會比俄羅斯攻打烏克蘭更嚴重。

日本首相岸田文雄就表示,美日兩國確認對台灣立場不變,強調台海和平穩定的重要性。

這是美國總統拜登再次表明美國會協助台灣防衛,較早前,拜登與岸田文雄舉行雙邊峰會,拜登指,美日同盟是印太地區和平和繁榮的基石,重申華府對日本防衛的承諾,又讚揚日本在俄羅斯出兵烏克蘭一事上,捍衛烏克蘭的民主價值。

拜登表明若北京攻台美將軍事介入 白宮澄清一中政策不變
https://hd.stheadline.com/news/realtime/...D%E8%AE%8A
[Image: _2022052316374718315.jpg]
拜登表明一旦北京攻台美將軍事介入,白宮澄清僅向台提供軍備,美對台政策未變。

美國總統拜登在日本會見日揆岸田文雄後見記者時,表明一旦中國大陸攻台,美國會軍事介入捍衞台灣。

美國總統拜登周一(23日)上午與日本首相岸田文雄舉行美日峰會,並在會後記者會中強調台海和平穩定重要性。有記者問及若北京攻台,美國又是否願意軍事介入。拜登回答表示:「中國無權用武力奪取台灣,美國願意使用軍力保衛台灣。」他也補充說:「我希望這不會發生,也不會有人試圖這麼做。」

有記者又以烏克蘭來作出類似的提問,只美國不願意軍事介入俄烏衝突,那麼如果北京攻打台灣,美方是否願意軍事介入?拜登回答:「是的」、「這是我們已作出的承諾。(That's the commitment we made)」。

白宮:美國對台灣政策沒有改變

不過拜登發表講話後,白宮發言人澄清,「正如總統所說,美國對台灣政策沒有改變,總統拜登重申了『一中政策』以及我們對台海和平的承諾,美國會根據《台灣關係法》為台灣提供自衛軍事手段」。

拜登現時正在進行他上任後首次亞洲之旅,他隨後在日本與四方安全對話(QUAD)其他國家領導人(日本、印度和洲)進行面對面會談。

對於,拜登這次疑似「口誤」,中國外交部發言人汪文斌回應表示,中方對美方的言論表示強烈不滿和堅決反對。台灣是中國領土不可分割的一部分,台灣問題純屬中國內政,不容任何外部勢力干涉。在涉及中國主權和領土完整等核心利益問題上,中方沒有任何妥協退讓餘地,任何人不要低估中國人民捍衛國家主權和領土完整的堅強決心、堅定意志、強大能力,不要站在14億中國人民的對立面。

汪文斌還強調,日本在台灣問題上對中國人民負有歷史罪責,更應謹言慎行,切實汲取歷史教訓,避免重蹈覆轍。

美武力護台 中:堅定捍衞國家主權
https://hk.finance.yahoo.com/news/%E7%BE...23354.html

針對美國總統拜登表態願意用武力保衞台灣,中國外交部新聞發言人汪文斌表示,對此堅決反對,中國將採取堅定措施捍衞國家主權和利益。

他並稱,美國不應支持台獨,不要低估中國人民捍衞國家主權的堅定決心,並敦促美國和日本遵守「一個中國」原則。

拜登稱,他願意使用武力來保衞台灣,美國與其他國家站在一起,以確保中國不能在台灣使用武力。他還提到,中國軍機靠近台灣飛行是在冒險。

【突發時空 070 USTWCN】拜登承諾台灣被中國攻擊時美軍會協防,真的有改變「戰略模糊」政策嗎?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWX99lQcBcI
[youtube]nWX99lQcBcI[/youtube]
Reply
#19
布林肯指北京對台行動破壞穩定 促引俄烏衝突為鑑
https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k...220615.htm

美國國務卿布林肯表示,過去幾年看到北京針對台灣,採取具有潛在危險和破壞穩定的行動。

他接受美國傳媒訪問時表示,俄羅斯出兵烏克蘭被多個國家聯合抵制,北京應該引以為鑑,又說,無法揣測北京會做或不做甚麼,但美國正努力改變可能影響北京決策的大環境。

布林肯重申美國協助台灣自衛的承諾不變,美國致力遵循一個中國政策和《台灣關係法》。美國在《台灣關係法》下,有責任確保台灣有能力保衛自己。

中國外交部多次強調,在涉及中國主權和領土完整的核心問題無妥協退讓餘地,敦促美方切實恪守一個中國原則和中美三個聯合公報規定,在台灣問題上謹言慎行,不向台獨分裂勢力發出錯誤信號,以免嚴重損害台海局勢和中美關係。
Reply
#20
拜登不是失言
https://www.hk01.com/sns/article/773771

[Image: aesyA0ShOgonpHIK95-6AKqe80mKEwpC_-UyyP_l...w1920r16_9]

如果年屆七十五是小布殊將烏克蘭說成是伊拉克的解釋,或許七十九歲也可以是拜登失言的藉口。然而一次的失言是失言,兩次、三次的「失言」似乎難以再用失言來解釋。即使是以胡謅見稱的特朗普,其言論也不是背後沒有想法,拜登的「失言」自然更是如此。

出訪日本的美國總統拜登被記者問及若中國大陸攻台時,表示美國願意武力介入捍衛台灣,「那是我們已作出的承諾」。跟去年拜登兩次表示美國會防衛台灣那樣,白宮發言人隨後澄清美國的一中政策沒有改變,表示拜登只是重申美國將按《台灣關係法》的承諾,供應軍備給台灣自衛。

戰略模糊與現實考慮

有人形容拜登正在背離戰略模糊政策,但隨着他一再「失言」及白宮一再澄清,誰能肯定這又何嘗不是另一種戰略模糊?美國政府在台海戰爭危機上的政策並沒有因為拜登多說幾句而變得清晰,反而令人愈聽愈摸不着頭腦。

而事實上,美國不但沒有軍事介入台海的許諾,迅速應變的能力亦都成疑。第七艦隊雖然以日本橫須賀為基地,但戴維森去年卸任美軍印太司令部司令前曾指出,美軍從西岸到第一島鏈增援的需時多達三星期。這還未算上從撤兵阿富汗到袖手烏克蘭,美國汲取了以往干預政策的教訓,對於用兵已經愈來愈多顧忌,愈來愈不情願。

由此可見,台灣雖然第一島鏈,但台海一旦爆發戰爭,美國的出兵意願、應對能力及規模相信受限。當然美國不會作壁上觀,但就好像烏克蘭危機那樣,經濟制裁等手段並不能將烏克蘭人民拯救出戰火之中。

「失言」與「語言偽術」

或許正因為美國有現實考慮而不欲軍事介入台海,因此才巧言令色,企圖起震懾之效。類似的戲碼在烏克蘭問題上已出現不只一次。拜登在1月曾言俄羅斯的「小規模入侵」只會引起「較小反應」,但這既無法阻止俄羅斯的大舉入侵,更反而令人看穿美國不會軍事介入。後來拜登又聲稱不能讓俄羅斯總統普京「繼續掌權」,以及自言打算親訪烏克蘭首都基輔,兩次也是要白宮澄清。拜登的一再「失言」,沒有一次能起震懾之效。

由克林頓在萊溫斯基醜聞的誤導言詞,到約翰遜在疫下派對的謊話被揭,我們對西方政客的「語言偽術」都不應該感到陌生。中方不會因拜登的協防台灣論而改變既有策略,台灣當局卻似乎聽得迷迷糊糊,其外交部表示感謝拜登和美國政府「重申堅守對台灣堅若磐石的承諾」。民進黨政府若昧於現實,真的以為美援可恃而愈加對抗中國,最終對兩岸人民都是有害無利。
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)